Digital Tutors

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Tuesday, 26 November 2013

Revit rendering vs. Autodesk cloud rendering - Fight!

Posted on 09:38 by Unknown

Recently I had the pleasure of designing a few options for a potential remodel of our lobby here at HQ. During this time I also trialed Autodesk 360's rendering service and I must say, I am impressed. What I liked most about it was the speed with which it rendered. The quality of the images was fair/good and the way it handled material textures was good, in fact in some cases better than Revit. But then the cloud handled some things a little oddly.
Looming deadlines are the modus operendi for Architects. Unfortunately for us, renderings usually take time and unless you have workstations set aside for rendering, you've got to juggle your time in Revit and your time rendering such that you can accomplish what you need in the nick of time. Well at least you used to have to juggle your time. With Autodesk's 360 cloud rendering, juggling time has become less of an issue. The cloud is FAST. And it's easy. Take the two draft images below for example. Both were set to roughly equivalent quality and size settings, though the model was at a different level of completeness in each which should explain the subtle differences. Revit took 1 day, 9 hours and 24 minutes to render. The Autodesk cloud took roughly 10 minutes.

Draft image rendered in Cloud (Final, Large, Advanced setting)
Draft image rendered in Revit (Best setting)
There are some noticeable differences though. It seems as though the cloud uses a different rendering engine. In fact if you check the Help, you'll find this statement:
"The rendering service relies on a new, highly optimized rendering engine. Minor differences in the appearance of materials should be expected."
In general the Revit rendering has a softer look to it which I like.

Materials: 

Note that some of the materials are not showing up in the cloud rendered version for the bar, and the chrome of the coffee table. These use stock, out-of-the box materials (Cherry and Chrome) so I sent off a note to the nice support folks about it. Apparently there's an issue using the "Tint" feature in the Revit material editor, though this was not used in these materials. They're looking at the file at the time of this writing and I'll try and update this post if I get a response/solution. I changed the materials for these elements to Wood - Cherry and Metal - Chrome and it rendered fine. 
The wall paint is also very different in appearance in the two different renderings. Some of this has to do with the exposure settings but the mottling of the material is typical Revit rendering effect. If you adjust your rendering settings in the Custom options, you can eliminate the mottling but I find it comes with a time cost.
The textured wall behind the receptionist turned out to be incorrectly rendered in Revit but correctly rendered in the cloud. As far as I can tell the texture and the bump are not aligning correctly even though they were locked and use the same image:

Rendered in Cloud
Good

Rendered in Revit
Not so good
   

Lighting: 

The lighting in the above draft has not been adjusted in terms of color. To make the fixtures glow, I created a new material called "light glow" and set the Self Illumination to create the fixture glow:

I later adjusted the color to match that of the fixtures photometrics. 

The lighting in both looks fairly good but in both the Cloud and Revit I had to adjust the exposure and white point to get the right brightness and tone. 
The odd thing about the lighting is that in the cloud rendered image, there's a black plane showing up in the fixture, perpendicular to the direction of the luminance, that is not in the family and isn't rendered by Revit. I ended up switching out the fixture for a different one as I couldn't find a way to eliminate it. 

Rendered in Revit
Looks correct
Rendered in Cloud
Ummm, wtf?


At the end of the day, I ended up finalizing the design and rendering 6 or so images via the cloud, blowing through the 25 free "cloud credits" and generating some good images for the presentation. I recommend you use the free "standard" setting until you are completely satisfied with the output materials, textures, lighting and so forth, before you spend your credits on rendering a "final"  Large image.  The dialog will let you know how many credits are required and this website has a breakdown of cost and the different settings. All in all the convenience is well worth the cost. You get 100 Cloud credits allocated annually for each software license on Subscription. According to the Revit Kid, Autodesk Cloud credits cost a buck each.

Rendered in Cloud

Rendered in Cloud

Rendered in Cloud


Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • What Revit Wants: Repurposing the Autodesk USB Media
      What Revit Wants: Repurposing the Autodesk USB Media   If you happen to have a 16Gb or 32Gb 2012 Autodesk Design Suite USB thumb dri...
  • Announcing new Revit training category at Digital-Tutors
    This past summer I was honored to be invited to be a Guest Tutor at Digital-Tutors . Digital-tutors has a wide variety of professionally cr...
  • BIM infographic
    I came across this infographic the other day on the  Line/Shape/Space  blog. I always find new metrics/statistics on BIM interesting and you...
  • Hively
    This is Revit-support related for within a firm, and thought I'd share. Check out Hively , it's a cool & easy way of encouraging...
  • Facets
    My last post mentioned the parametric facet massing family component I have been working on. The little image I posted may have given you an...
  • Finally - A tablet large enough to mark-up drawings in a somewhat practical manner
    Reposted from  http://technology4architects.blogspot.com/ Recently  Dell  introduced the largest tablet available to the consumer market, th...
  • Noteblock for tracking comments in Revit
    This is one of those ingenious uses of the tools in Revit to make collaborating better: BIM Troublemaker: Comment Tracking Using Noteblock S...
  • Handy tool to identify good keyboard shortcuts 4u
    I just came across this little tool on Rod Howarth's blog and if you work in Revit day-to-day then you'll find this useful. It anal...
  • New Revit uniforms
    If your office is considering implimenting Revit, make a splash with a Revit outfit like this. If you already are amongst the Revit guru fir...
  • Product Design Suite Test Drive -- Revit - Inventor BIM Exchange
    This is a short demonstration from Autodesk of the BIM exchange from Inventor to native Revit family file. Manufacturers take note! Architec...

Categories

  • 3d Printing
  • Add-in
  • Add-ons
  • beta
  • BIM
  • BIMapps
  • clothing
  • Cloud
  • Components
  • Craig Barbieri
  • dependant files
  • efficiency
  • etransmit
  • families
  • feedback
  • funny
  • halflife2
  • hardware
  • Hatch
  • hively
  • humor
  • Infographic
  • joke
  • Labs
  • metrics
  • Neon
  • performance
  • Plug-in
  • Plugins
  • Rendering
  • Revit
  • Revit 2012
  • Revit STL
  • Revit Technologies
  • RFI's
  • Scheduling
  • Standards
  • support
  • sympathy
  • Tips
  • Transmittals
  • Tricks
  • Vasari
  • workstation

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2013 (13)
    • ▼  November (3)
      • Revit rendering vs. Autodesk cloud rendering - Fight!
      • Classical Architecture with Revit
      • What to Expect When Your Client Is Expecting BIM -...
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (10)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (28)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (3)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (8)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (18)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (2)
  • ►  2007 (3)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  August (1)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile